<USER_REQUEST>
@[/ssh-remote+7b22686f73744e616d65223a226d792d736572766572227d/home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl]
이 말이 다 맞아? 수정사항도 다 맞고 설계도 똑바로된건가
</USER_REQUEST>
<ADDITIONAL_METADATA>
The current local time is: 2026-08-13T22:38:19+09:00.

The user's current state is as follows:
Active Document: /home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl (LANGUAGE_JSON)
Cursor is on line: 1563

The user has mentioned some items in the form @[ITEM]. Here is extra information about the items that were mentioned by the user, in the order that they appear:

@[/ssh-remote+7b22686f73744e616d65223a226d792d736572766572227d/home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl] is a [File]:
/ssh-remote+7b22686f73744e616d65223a226d792d736572766572227d/home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl
</ADDITIONAL_METADATA>
<USER_SETTINGS_CHANGE>
The user changed setting `Model Selection` from None to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking). No need to comment on this change if the user doesn't ask about it. If reporting what model you are, please use a human readable name instead of the exact string.
</USER_SETTINGS_CHANGE>


먼저 해당 대화 파일을 읽어보겠습니다.

The user wants me to review a JSONL file that appears to be an AI chat conversation log, and verify if the content/modifications/design described in it are correct. Let me read the file first.


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:24+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:38:24+09:00
File Path: `file:///home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl`
Total Lines: 1563
Total Bytes: 2175522
Showing lines 1 to 800
Content truncated: showing bytes 0-46080 of 960433. To see more, call this tool again with the same line range and ContentOffset=46080.
The following code has been modified to include a line number before every line, in the format: <line_number>: <original_line>. Please note that any changes targeting the original code should remove the line number, colon, and leading space.
1: {"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<timestamp>Wednesday, Aug 12, 2026, 10:30 AM (UTC+9)</timestamp>\n<user_query>\n@.agents/anti_chat/transcript_full.jsonl @.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl 이 말이 전부 사실이야? \n이전 커밋과 비교해서 달라진점은? 그리고 실매내역 탭에 매도 매수 호가 잔량 나오던것도 사라지고 다른 백테 탭도 확인좀\n</user_query>"}]}}
2: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"The user is asking me to:\n1. Check if the content in the transcript files is all true\n2. Compare with previous commits to see what changed\n3. Check if the bid/ask quantity display in the actual trading history tab is gone\n4. Check other backtest tabs\n\nLet me first read the transcript files to understand what they're saying."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/.agents/anti_chat/transcript_full.jsonl","limit":100}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl","limit":100}}]}}
3: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"The files are very large. Let me try to search for specific content in the transcript files to understand what they're saying."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && ls .agents/anti_chat/","description":"List anti_chat agent directory contents"}}]}}
4: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c \"\nimport json\n\n# 2.jsonl 에서 assistant 메시지만 추출\nmessages = []\nwith open('.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n    for line in f:\n        line = line.strip()\n        if not line:\n            continue\n        try:\n            obj = json.loads(line)\n            if isinstance(obj, dict) and obj.get('role') == 'assistant':\n                content = obj.get('content', '')\n                if isinstance(content, list):\n                    for c in content:\n                        if isinstance(c, dict) and c.get('type') == 'text':\n                            messages.append(c.get('text', '')[:2000])\n                elif isinstance(content, str):\n                    messages.append(content[:2000])\n        except:\n            pass\n\nprint(f'총 어시스턴트 메시지 수: {len(messages)}')\nfor i, m in enumerate(messages[:5]):\n    print(f'=== 메시지 {i+1} ===')\n    print(m[:1000])\n    print()\n\" 2>&1 | head -200\n","description":"Extract assistant messages from 2.jsonl transcript","block_until_ms":30000}}]}}
5: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && head -c 5000 .agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl | python3 -c \"\nimport sys\ndata = sys.stdin.read()\nprint(repr(data[:2000]))\n\"","description":"Peek at the structure of 2.jsonl"}}]}}
6: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"I can see the file is a JSONL file with structured transcript data. Let me look at more of it to understand the context and what changes were made.\n\nLet me read the 2.jsonl file more to understand what the anti_chat transcript contains. It seems to be a transcript of agent interactions about bugs/issues with the trading bot. Let me get the key summary/assertion messages."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c \"\nimport json\n\n# 2.jsonl에서 모든 텍스트 콘텐츠 추출 (타입별)\ntypes_found = {}\nwith open('.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n    for line in f:\n        line = line.strip()\n        if not line:\n            continue\n        try:\n            obj = json.loads(line)\n            t = obj.get('type', 'unknown')\n            types_found[t] = types_found.get(t, 0) + 1\n        except:\n            pass\n\nprint('타입별 개수:', types_found)\n\" 2>&1","description":"Check all types in 2.jsonl"}}]}}
7: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c \"\nimport json\n\n# USER_INPUT과 PLANNER_RESPONSE만 추출해서 대화 흐름 파악\nmessages = []\nwith open('.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n    for line in f:\n        line = line.strip()\n        if not line:\n            continue\n        try:\n            obj = json.loads(line)\n            t = obj.get('type', '')\n            if t in ('USER_INPUT', 'PLANNER_RESPONSE'):\n                content = obj.get('content', '')\n                if isinstance(content, str):\n                    messages.append((t, content[:1500]))\n        except:\n            pass\n\nfor t, c in messages:\n    print(f'=== [{t}] ===')\n    print(c[:800])\n    print()\n\" 2>&1 | head -500","description":"Extract user input and planner responses to understand conversation"}}]}}
8: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I have a good understanding of the 2.jsonl transcript. Let me get more of the transcript to understand the final conclusions and what changes were actually made.\n\nThe key issues from the transcript so far:\n1. The KIS websocket was connecting to mock/virtual trading server for orderbook data\n2. The previous agent made mistakes and was defending incorrect information\n3. Eventually they found that `kis_ws_ob` was getting `is_mock=True` passed to it\n\nLet me get more of this transcript and also check the git log."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c \"\nimport json\n\nmessages = []\nwith open('.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n    for line in f:\n        line = line.strip()\n        if not line:\n            continue\n        try:\n            obj = json.loads(line)\n            t = obj.get('type', '')\n            if t in ('USER_INPUT', 'PLANNER_RESPONSE'):\n                content = obj.get('content', '')\n                if isinstance(content, str) and content.strip():\n                    messages.append((t, content[:2000]))\n        except:\n            pass\n\n# 뒷부분만 출력 (결론 부분)\nfor t, c in messages[-8:]:\n    print(f'=== [{t}] ===')\n    print(c[:1500])\n    print()\n\" 2>&1","description":"Extract last messages from 2.jsonl to understand conclusions"}}]}}
9: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 transcript를 파악했습니다. git 로그와 현재 웹 상태를 확인하겠습니다.\n\nNow I have a good understanding of the 2.jsonl transcript. Let me also check what actual code changes were made (git log). The key issues from the transcript:\n\n1. The anti-chat agent had a series of mistakes and arguments with the user\n2. Key facts:\n   - Kiwoom WS was connecting to mock server for condition search/historical data (키움쪽 시세 호가 데이터가 모의로 연결됨)\n   - The anti-chat agent eventually admitted to fixing this\n   - LS WebSocket was added as a secondary fallback between main WS and KIS REST\n   - The start alert was updated to display the WS connection type (실전/모의)\n   - The agent accidentally deleted some DB storage code but later restored it\n\nI need to verify the actual git changes and check whether the bid/ask quantity display (매도 매수 호가 잔량) is still showing in the trading history tab, plus review the other backtest tabs."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git log --oneline -30 2>&1","description":"Check recent git commits"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git log --since=\"2026-08-10\" --oneline --stat 2>&1 | head -200","description":"Recent git changes since Aug 10"}}]}}
10: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me look at the actual diff to understand what changed specifically related to:\n1. The Kiwoom WS mock vs real connection issue\n2. The bid/ask quantity display (매도 매수 호가 잔량) in actual trading history tab\n3. Other backtest tab issues\n\nLet me check the specific changes in ws_manager.py and the backtest web related files."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git log --oneline --since=\"2026-08-10\" 2>&1","description":"Commits since Aug 10"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py 2>&1 | head -200","description":"Diff ws_manager.py between last two commits"}}]}}
11: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py 2>&1 | tail -150","description":"Rest of ws_manager.py diff"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- backtest_web.py 2>&1 | grep \"^[-+]\" | grep -v \"^---\\|^+++\" | head -200","description":"Check backtest_web.py changes summary"}}]}}
12: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I have a good picture of what changed. Let me also check the trade_orderbook_enrich.py file which was newly added and seems related to the bid/ask display in the trades table.\n\nKey findings so far:\n1. `_finalize_trades_ui` function was added to backtest_web.py, which calls `enrich_trades_with_orderbook`\n2. The \"trades\" in the web response was changed from `_trades_recent_first(trades, 200)` to `_finalize_trades_ui(db, trades, 200, strategy_hint=str(strategy or \"\"))` \n3. The enrichment should be adding orderbook data to the trades, but the user is reporting that the bid/ask quantity columns have disappeared from the trading history tab. I need to examine the HTML template and the enrichment logic to see if there's a mismatch between what's being added and what's being displayed."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- backtest_web.py 2>&1 | grep -E \"^[+-].*trade|^[+-].*orderbook|^[+-].*hoga|^[+-].*ob_\" | head -100","description":"Check trade and orderbook specific changes in backtest_web.py"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git show c6bd62a:kis_trader/backtest/trade_orderbook_enrich.py 2>&1 | head -100","description":"Check new trade_orderbook_enrich.py file"}}]}}
13: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I have a good understanding. The `trade_orderbook_enrich.py` is a new file that was ADDED to enrich trades with orderbook data. The `backtest_web.py` was changed to use `_finalize_trades_ui` which calls `enrich_trades_with_orderbook`. This is actually supposed to ADD bid/ask data to the trades.\n\nBut the user is saying that the bid/ask quantity (호가 잔량) that was previously showing in the actual trading history tab has now DISAPPEARED. \n\nLet me check the HTML template to see what's being rendered and understand why the bid/ask data might have disappeared."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- templates/backtest.html 2>&1 | grep -E \"^[+-].*(hoga|호가|bidp|askp|잔량|ob_)\" | head -50","description":"Check backtest.html changes for orderbook/hoga columns"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"hoga\\|호가\\|bidp\\|askp\\|잔량\\|ob_entry\\|ob_exit\\|ob_spread\" templates/backtest.html | head -50","description":"Find bid/ask orderbook columns in HTML template"}}]}}
14: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"ob_entry\\|ob_exit\\|entry_ob\\|exit_ob\\|buy_ob\\|sell_ob\\|ob_spread\\|or_ratio\" templates/backtest.html | head -50","description":"Find orderbook enrichment columns in HTML template"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"live_trades\\|실매내역\\|거래내역\\|live.*trade\\|trade.*live\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find live trades section in HTML"}}]}}
15: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html","offset":2170,"limit":100}}]}}
16: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 실매내역 탭을 직접 확인해보겠습니다.\n\nLet me now look at the actual live trades (실매내역) display in the HTML template to find the bid/ask columns."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"실매내역\\|실거래\\|live_trade\\|actual_trade\\|실제거래\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find live/actual trades section in HTML"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bidp1\\|askp1\\|매수잔량\\|매도잔량\\|best_bid\\|best_ask\\|ob_entry\\|entry_bid\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find specific bid/ask fields in HTML"}}]}}
17: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":150,"offset":207,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
18: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I see the actual trading history tab (실거래 분석 탭). The table at line 335-343 has these columns:\n- 종목, 매수시각, 매도시각, 매수가, 매도가, 수량, 손익(원), 수익률%, 누적손익, 누적%, 보유(분), 체결디버그, 매도사유\n\nThere's no bid/ask (호가 잔량) columns here. Let me check the git diff to see if there was previously bid/ask data shown in this table.\nI need to look at the previous version to see what changed."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git show cb7e503:templates/backtest.html 2>&1 | grep -n \"act_tbody\\|act_table\\|bidp\\|askp\\|잔량\\|ob_entry\\|ob_exit\\|ob_spread\\|매수잔\\|매도잔\" | head -30","description":"Check previous version of backtest.html for bid/ask columns in act_tbody"}}]}}
19: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git show cb7e503:templates/backtest.html | sed -n '330,345p'","description":"Check previous version's actual trades table header"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"ob_entry\\|ob_exit\\|entry_ob\\|매수잔\\|매도잔\\|bidp\\|askp\\|spread\\|or_ratio\\|best_bid\\|best_ask\" static/js/backtest.js | head -50","description":"Check backtest.js for bid/ask display logic"}}]}}
20: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"entryOb\\|exitOb\\|entry_ob\\|exit_ob\\|매수호가\\|매도호가\" static/js/backtest.js | head -50","description":"Find entry/exit orderbook display in backtest.js"}}]}}
21: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":130,"offset":195,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/static/js/backtest.js"}}]}}
22: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":30,"offset":394,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/static/js/backtest.js"}}]}}
23: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I see - in `backtest.js`, the trade table rendering (line 411-412) shows `_entryObCellHtml(r.entryOb)` and `_exitObCellHtml(r.exitOb, r.isOpen)`, which display M (mid_ratio) and W (whale_ratio). These are the orderbook cells.\n\nBut looking at the HTML at line 335-340 in backtest.html:\n```html\n<thead><tr>\n  <th>종목</th><th>매수시각</th><th>매도시각</th>\n  <th>매수가</th><th>매도가</th><th>수량</th>\n  <th>손익(원)</th><th>수익률%</th><th>누적손익</th><th>누적%</th>\n  <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th>매도사유</th>\n</tr></thead>\n```\n\nThe JavaScript is inserting two additional columns for the entry and exit orderbook data after the debug column, but the HTML header only defines 13 columns total without accounting for these two extra orderbook columns.\n\nLooking at the actual insertion order in the code, it goes: hold time → debug (if enabled) → entry orderbook → exit orderbook → sell reason. So there's definitely a mismatch between what the header declares and what the rows are actually rendering.\n\nThe user is saying the bid/ask quantities disappeared, which means either the JavaScript stopped generating those extra cells, or the underlying data for entry_ob and exit_ob is now empty or undefined. The `entryOb` and `exitOb` fields are pulling mid and whale ratio percentages from the orderbook snapshot, not bid/ask quantities like the user might expect. I need to trace back through the actual trades table to see what data was being displayed before and understand what \"매도 매수 호가 잔량\" (bid/ask quantity) actually refers to in this context. Looking at the table structure, there are 13 visible columns in the HTML headers, but the JavaScript is trying to add two more columns for entry and exit orderbook data. The user might be saying these extra columns are now showing dashes instead of actual values, or possibly that they've disappeared from the display entirely—though the distinction between missing data and missing columns is unclear from what they said.\n\nLet me check what the previous version of backtest.js was doing to understand what was being displayed before, since the new enrichment script pulls orderbook data from the database and would show dashes if that data doesn't exist for the trades."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- static/js/backtest.js 2>&1 | grep -E \"^[+-].*(entryOb|exitOb|entry_ob|exit_ob|_entryOb|_exitOb|호가잔\\|bid_qty\\|ask_qty)\" | head -30","description":"Check JS changes for bid/ask ob display"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git show cb7e503:static/js/backtest.js | grep -n \"entryOb\\|exitOb\\|entry_ob\\|exit_ob\\|_entryOb\\|_exitOb\\|bidp\\|askp\\|잔량\\|호가잔\" | head -30","description":"Check previous version of backtest.js for ob display"}}]}}
24: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"So:\n1. `entryOb`, `exitOb`, `_entryObCellHtml`, `_exitObCellHtml` are ALL **new** additions in the latest commit (`c6bd62a`)\n2. They were NOT in the previous version\n\nThis means these cells were ADDED in the latest commit, not removed! So the user couldn't have seen these \"disappear\" if they were never there before.\n\nWait, but then the user is saying they \"used to see bid/ask quantities\" (매도 매수 호가 잔량 나오던것도 사라지고). Maybe they're referring to something completely different? Or maybe they're confused about what they saw before?\nLet me look at the actual table structure to see what columns are currently being rendered.\n\nSo JavaScript is dynamically adding two extra columns (entryOb and exitOb) that don't exist in the HTML headers, which means the last column (매도사유) ends up misaligned with its header. The HTML only defines 13 headers total, but the JavaScript is creating 15 data cells, causing a mismatch between what's displayed and what's labeled.\n\nThe user mentioned the bid/ask orderbook quantities that used to show in the live trades tab have disappeared, but I'm seeing those columns were actually added in the latest commit. I should check if they're referring to a different display location—maybe the virtual trades section within each strategy backtest tab shows this data differently."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bid_qty\\|ask_qty\\|bidVolume\\|askVolume\\|bid_volume\\|ask_volume\\|매수잔\\|매도잔\\|호가잔량\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find bid/ask volume columns in template"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bid_qty\\|ask_qty\\|bidVolume\\|askVolume\\|bid_volume\\|ask_volume\\|매수잔\\|매도잔\\|호가잔량\" static/js/backtest.js | head -30","description":"Find bid/ask volume in JS"}}]}}
25: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"th.*매수.*호\\|th.*매도.*호\\|호가.*th\\|잔량.*th\\|th.*잔\\|or_ratio\\|매수잔\\|매도잔\\|총매수잔\\|총매도잔\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find orderbook quantity headers in template"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- templates/backtest.html 2>&1 | grep -E \"^[+-].*<th\" | head -50","description":"Check what table headers changed in backtest.html"}}]}}
26: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- templates/backtest.html 2>&1 | wc -l","description":"Check if backtest.html changed at all"}}]}}
27: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- templates/backtest.html 2>&1","description":"Full diff of backtest.html changes"}}]}}
28: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"OK, now I see something important! In the `backtest.html` diff at the SCALP (bt) section (around line 615 → new code around line 636):\n\nThe NEW code has a DUPLICATE `bt_eod_enabled`, `bt_eod_time`, `bt_eod_cancel_open`, `bt_eod_sell_holdings` section added BEFORE the existing one. This is a duplication bug!\n\nLooking at the diff:\n```\n+      <div class=\"row g-2 align-items-center mt-2 p-2 rounded\" style=\"background:#161b22;border:1px solid #30363d\">\n```\n\nAnd now I'm seeing the start of the EOD section with a Korean label for end-of-day market close liquidation, adding a checkbox to enable this feature...\n\n```\n\n```\n\nI see there's a duplicate ID issue in the HTML where `bt_eod_enabled`, `bt_eod_time`, `bt_eod_cancel_open`, and `bt_eod_sell_holdings` are being added again, which could break JavaScript functionality. More importantly, the JavaScript is now rendering `entry_ob` and `exit_ob` columns in the trades table, but the HTML doesn't have corresponding `<th>` headers for these columns, which is likely why the user is seeing the order book quantity data disappear from the actual trades tab. Writing table cell logic... I see there's a mismatch between the number of table headers (13) and the columns being generated by the JavaScript (14-15 depending on options). The extra TD cells will render without corresponding headers, which is valid HTML but means some columns won't have labels. Looking at the column structure, it seems the headers stop before accounting for the exit_ob and reason columns that the JS is adding. So the ob columns don't have headers but display data, and the 매도사유 column is misaligned—it's at position 15 in the data but only has a header at position 13. I need to check if the HTML table structure was actually modified to handle these new columns, or if this is just a mismatch between what the JavaScript generates and what the HTML expects. Let me look at what actually changed in the backtest.html file to see if the header setup was updated. Adding table cells for the order book columns...\n\nThe code is inserting entry and exit order book data into each row, but these columns didn't exist in the previous version at all. So the user couldn't have seen them before and watched them disappear—they're brand new additions. I need to reconsider what the user is actually reporting.\n\nLooking back at their Korean message about \"매도 매수 호가 잔량\" (sell/buy prices and remaining quantity)—this sounds like they're describing bid/ask display information, which is different from the mid_ratio and whale_ratio I was examining. Maybe they're comparing against a different version or there's confusion about which changes they're seeing.\n\nLet me check what the latest commit actually modified in backtest.js to understand what might have broken the display they're referring to."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- static/js/backtest.js 2>&1 | wc -l","description":"Size of JS diff"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git diff cb7e503 c6bd62a -- static/js/backtest.js 2>&1 | head -300","description":"Start of JS diff"}}]}}
29: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"브라우저로 현재 웹 UI 상태를 확인하겠습니다.\n\nNow I have a much clearer picture. Let me now understand the issue.\n\nLooking at the JS diff:\n1. `_entryObCellHtml` and `_exitObCellHtml` are NEW additions in this commit\n2. They show `M:xx%` and `W:xx%` (mid_ratio, whale_ratio from the orderbook)\n3. The HTML table headers for the actual trades tab don't have columns for these\n\nBut the user is saying \"매도 매수 호가 잔량 나오던것도 사라지고\" - i.e., the bid/ask orderbook quantities that used to show are NOW GONE.\nMaybe the user isn't comparing against the previous commit at all—they might be referring to changes the anti-chat agent made that are now broken after this latest commit. Let me check what the anti-chat agent actually modified in the trades display by looking through those transcripts to understand the full context."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && systemctl is-active kis_backtest_web.service && curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' http://127.0.0.1:5050/","description":"Check backtest web service status"}}]}}
30: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && sudo systemctl restart kis_backtest_web.service && sleep 2 && systemctl is-active kis_backtest_web.service && curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' http://127.0.0.1:5050/","description":"Restart backtest web service before browser check"}}]}}
31: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Task","input":{"description":"Check backtest web UI - actual trades and backtest tabs","prompt":"Check the backtest web UI at http://192.168.0.149:5050/ and verify the following:\n1. Navigate to the \"📊 실거래 분석\" tab (actual trades tab)\n2. Check what columns are in the trades table header (specifically looking for bid/ask orderbook quantity columns - \"호가 잔량\", \"M:\", \"W:\" type columns)\n3. Also select SHORT strategy and click 조회 to see actual trade rows\n4. Then check other backtest tabs (스캘핑, 꼬리잡기, 돌파, 모멘텀) - look for any obvious issues or missing elements\n5. Look for any duplicate UI elements (especially in the 스캘핑 tab - EOD settings)\n6. Take screenshots of the actual trades table and each backtest tab\n\nImportant:\n- ONLY use http://192.168.0.149:5050/ (NOT localhost or 127.0.0.1)\n- Report all findings in detail\n\nReturn:\n- What columns are in the actual trades table\n- Whether there are any duplicate UI elements\n- Status of each backtest tab\n- Any console errors found\n","subagent_type":"browser-use"}}]}}
32: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 전체 상황을 파악했습니다. 각 항목별로 정리하겠습니다.\n\n---\n\n## 1. transcript (2.jsonl) 주요 내용의 사실 여부 검증\n\n**결론: 일부는 사실이나, 핵심 부분에서 에이전트가 틀렸고 사용자 지적이 옳았습니다.**\n\n| 항목 | 에이전트 주장 | 실제 사실 |\n|---|---|---|\n| \"키움/KIS WS 처음부터 실전 연결됐다\" | 초기 방어 주장 | **틀림** — 에이전트 결국 인정: `kis_ws_ob`에 `is_mock=is_mock` 패스 버그가 있었음 |\n| \"키움 시세는 `KIWOOM_WS_FORCE_REAL=true`로 실전 강제됐다\" | 사실 | **맞음** — 코드에 이미 존재한 안전장치 |\n| \"호가 WS가 모의 서버로 연결됐다\" | 사용자 주장→에이전트 뒤늦게 인정 | **맞음** — `kis_ws_ob`의 `is_mock` 버그가 원인 |\n| \"REST 폴백은 내가 만든 게 아니라 원래부터 있었다\" | 에이전트 주장 | **맞음** — 원래 구조상 WS 끊기면 KIS REST 폴백 |\n| \"봇이 100% 완벽하게 작동한다\" | 에이전트 마지막 결론 | **과장** — EOD 중복 UI 버그 등 실제 이슈 있음 |\n| \"탈락 로그가 폭포처럼 쏟아진다\" | 에이전트 주장 | 로그에는 있으나 메신저로는 안 옴(정상 설계) |\n\n---\n\n## 2. 이전 커밋 대비 주요 변경사항 (cb7e503 → c6bd62a)\n\n**실매에 영향 있는 변경:**\n- `WS_TICK_GRACE_SEC` 기본값: **30초 → 180초** (유예 3분으로 늘림)\n- `LIVE_TICK_PROVIDER` / `LIVE_OB_PROVIDER` env 추가 (키움/KIS 우선순위 전환)\n- KIS 2차 호가 전용 WS(`kis_ws_ob`) 코드 추가 — `is_mock=is_mock` 버그 여전히 있음 (미사용 상태)\n- 시작 알림에 `📡 [시세웹소켓] 키움(실전), KIS(실전)` 표시 추가\n- `ws_manager.py` 스마트 갭보정 검열로 불필요한 REST 호출 차단 강화\n\n**백테/웹에만 영향:**\n- 캔들/시세/호가 소스 선택 드롭다운 모든 탭에 추가\n- `trade_orderbook_enrich.py` 신규 (거래내역에 호가 데이터 부착)\n- 거래내역에 네이버 외부 링크 추가\n- 거래내역 행에 `entry_ob`/`exit_ob` 컬럼 추가 (JS 코드)\n\n---\n\n## 3. 실매내역 탭 호가 컬럼 문제\n\n**근본 원인**: JS 코드에 `entry_ob`/`exit_ob` 셀이 추가되었는데 **HTML `<thead>`에 대응하는 `<th>` 헤더가 없습니다.**\n\n**스캘핑 탭 EOD 중복 버그**: `bt_eod_enabled`, `bt_eod_time` 등 ID가 **HTML에 2개 중복**되어 있습니다.\n\n지금 두 가지를 수정합니다.\n\nNow I have a clear picture of the issues:\n\n1. **실거래 분석 탭**: The trade table doesn't have header columns for the new entry_ob/exit_ob (M/W) data even though the JS code tries to add them. The user was saying these \"disappeared\" but based on git history, these `_entryObCellHtml` and `_exitObCellHtml` functions were just ADDED in the latest commit. They're not showing up in headers because the HTML <th> wasn't updated. \n\n   But wait - the browser agent says the columns don't exist at all. But JS should be adding the data cells... Unless the data (entry_ob, exit_ob) from the API is all null, so they show `-` in cells with no headers. \n\nThe cells are being added unconditionally in the code, so they should render even with null data showing as dashes, but without corresponding header elements the visual alignment would be off. The user might have seen different behavior in an earlier version, or the latest commit changed how this data flows through the system. The main issues are: the Scalping tab has a duplicated EOD settings block that needs fixing, and the bid/ask quantity columns are missing both the HTML headers and likely the actual data since the enrichment script may not be working yet. Let me verify these findings against what was actually changed. The startup alert now displays both Kiwoom and KIS as live connections, LS WebSocket was added as a fallback option, and the grace period for WebSocket ticks was extended from 30 to 180 seconds. The main code updates include adding the KIS orderbook WebSocket with environment variables to switch between providers and implementing a smarter gap-fill check to reduce unnecessary REST calls. I'm also seeing that a new file handles enriching trades with orderbook data, and `main.py` has undergone significant changes. The real issue is that while the JavaScript is adding cells for entry and exit orderbook data unconditionally, the HTML table headers are missing for these columns, and the database might not be populating the data either—so the user isn't seeing any new columns in the trades table at all.\n\nI need to fix two things: remove the duplicate EOD block in the scalping tab, and add the missing table headers for the orderbook columns. But I'm also wondering if the user's complaint about losing bid/ask orderbook data that was previously visible is actually accurate, since looking at the earlier commit, those columns didn't exist before.\n\nLet me reconsider—maybe the user is referring to something they saw more recently rather than comparing to an old commit. Since there's only been one commit since mid-August, all the changes are contained there. The real issue seems to be that the new JavaScript is adding orderbook cells to every row, but the HTML table is missing the corresponding column headers.\n\nSo the cells exist in the DOM but appear unlabeled, and the data shows as dashes because orderbook information isn't being populated. When the user says these columns \"disappeared,\" they might mean the whole display looks misaligned or broken now.\n\nI should focus on what actually needs fixing: adding the missing `<th>` headers for the entry and exit orderbook columns in the trades table, and then addressing the scalping EOD duplication bug."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"TodoWrite","input":{"todos":[{"id":"fix-act-table-headers","content":"실거래 분석 탭 거래내역 테이블에 entry_ob/exit_ob 헤더 추가","status":"in_progress"},{"id":"fix-scalp-eod-dupe","content":"스캘핑 탭 EOD 설정 중복 블록 제거","status":"pending"},{"id":"fix-virt-table-headers","content":"가상거래내역 테이블도 동일하게 헤더 확인/추가","status":"pending"}],"merge":false}}]}}
33: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":15,"offset":333,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
34: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html","old_string":"            <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th>매도사유</th>\n          </tr></thead>\n          <tbody id=\"act_tbody\"></tbody>\n        </table>\n      </div>\n    </div>\n  </div>\n\n  <!-- ═══ 운영 설정 (실매 env 실시간 조회·저장) ═════════════════════════════ -->","new_string":"            <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th title=\"매수 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매수호가</th><th title=\"매도 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매도호가</th><th>매도사유</th>\n          </tr></thead>\n          <tbody id=\"act_tbody\"></tbody>\n        </table>\n      </div>\n    </div>\n  </div>\n\n  <!-- ═══ 운영 설정 (실매 env 실시간 조회·저장) ═════════════════════════════ -->"}}]}}
35: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 가상거래내역 테이블들도 확인합니다."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"tbody.*>\\|<tbody\\|<th>보유.*분.*<\\/th><th>체결디버그\" templates/backtest.html | head -30","description":"Find all trade tables with debug column"}}]}}
36: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"I need to update all the trade tables that have `<th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th>매도사유</th>` pattern to add the two new orderbook columns before `매도사유`. Let me find and update each one:\n\n1. Line 1402: `tl_tbody` (꼬리잡기)\n2. Line 1975: `bo_tbody` (돌파)\n3. Line 2674: `mom_tbody` (모멘텀)\n4. Line 3190: `usmom_tbody` (해외모멘텀)\n5. Line 814: `bt_tbody` (scalping) - need to check its headers first"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":10,"offset":805,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
37: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"showDebug\\|showRsi\\|showCumulative\" static/js/backtest.js | grep -v \"function\\|//\" | head -30","description":"Check which tables use showDebug/showRsi options"}}]}}
38: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"renderVirtualTrades.*bt_tbody\\|renderVirtualTrades.*tl_tbody\\|renderVirtualTrades.*bo_tbody\\|renderVirtualTrades.*mom_tbody\\|renderVirtualTrades.*usmom_tbody\\|renderVirtualTrades.*act_tbody\" static/js/backtest.js | head -20","description":"Find which tables use renderVirtualTrades with which tbody IDs"}}]}}
39: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":10,"offset":2043,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/static/js/backtest.js"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":8,"offset":4738,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/static/js/backtest.js"}}]}}
40: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"전체 거래내역 테이블에 헤더를 일괄 추가합니다. 패턴별로 분류:\n- showDebug=true: `체결디버그` 뒤에 `매수호가|매도호가` 추가\n- showRsi=true, showDebug=false (bt_tbody): 바로 `매수호가|매도호가` 추가\n\nNow I understand the full picture:\n\n- `act_tbody` (실거래 분석): `showDebug: true, showCumulative: true` → columns: 종목|매수시각|매도시각|매수가|매도가|수량|손익|수익률%|누적손익|누적%|보유(분)|체결디버그|entry_ob|exit_ob|매도사유\n- `bo_tbody` (돌파): `showDebug: true, showCumulative: true` → same as above\n- `usmom_tbody` (해외모멘텀): `showDebug: true, showCumulative: true`\n- `mom_tbody` (모멘텀): `showDebug: true, showCumulative: true`\n- `bt_tbody` (스캘핑): `showRsi: true, showCumulative: true` → No showDebug, so it includes RSI instead: 종목|매수시각|매도시각|매수가|매도가|수량|손익|수익률%|누적손익|누적%|보유(분)|entry_ob|exit_ob|매도사유|진입RSI\n- `tl_tbody` (꼬리잡기): `showDebug: true` with showCumulative\n\nNow I'm clarifying the column structure for tables using `renderVirtualTrades`. When showDebug is enabled, I include the debug column; when it's not, I skip it. The RSI column appears only when showRsi is true. So for `bt_tbody` which lacks showDebug but has showRsi, the columns should be 보유(분)|매수호가|매도호가|매도사유|진입RSI, but the current header is missing the order book columns.\n\nI need to systematically update the headers across all affected tables—`bo_tbody`, `usmom_tbody`, `mom_tbody`, `tl_tbody`, and `bt_tbody`—to match the correct column order based on their debug and RSI settings."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":6,"offset":1398,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":6,"offset":1971,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":6,"offset":2670,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":6,"offset":3186,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
41: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"모두 동일한 패턴(`체결디버그</th><th>매도사유`)이므로 `replace_all`로 한번에 업데이트합니다."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html","old_string":"            <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th>매도사유</th>\n          </tr></thead>","new_string":"            <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th title=\"매수 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매수호가</th><th title=\"매도 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매도호가</th><th>매도사유</th>\n          </tr></thead>","replace_all":true}}]}}
42: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"해외모멘텀은 들여쓰기가 다르니 별도로:"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"new_string":"              <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th title=\"매수 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매수호가</th><th title=\"매도 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매도호가</th><th>매도사유</th>\n            </tr></thead>","old_string":"              <th>보유(분)</th><th>체결디버그</th><th>매도사유</th>\n            </tr></thead>","path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
43: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 스캘핑(bt_tbody) 테이블 헤더도 수정합니다. `showDebug=false`, `showRsi=true`이므로 체결디버그 없이 `매수호가|매도호가` 추가:"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":7,"offset":808,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
44: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"new_string":"            <th>손익(원)</th><th>수익률%</th><th>누적손익</th><th>누적%</th><th>보유(분)</th><th title=\"매수 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매수호가</th><th title=\"매도 시점 호가 (M:중간비율 W:고래비율)\">매도호가</th><th>매도사유</th><th>진입RSI</th>","old_string":"            <th>손익(원)</th><th>수익률%</th><th>누적손익</th><th>누적%</th><th>보유(분)</th><th>매도사유</th><th>진입RSI</th>","path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
45: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"이제 스캘핑 탭 EOD 중복 블록을 제거합니다."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bt_eod_enabled\\|bt_eod_time\\|bt_eod_cancel_open\\|bt_eod_sell_holdings\" templates/backtest.html | head -20","description":"Find all bt_eod element occurrences"}}]}}
46: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":70,"offset":614,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
47: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I can see the duplicate EOD block. Lines 620-645 is the NEWLY added (duplicate) block, and lines 646-656 is the original block. I need to remove lines 620-645 (the newly added duplicate).\n\nThe original block (lines 646-656) has:\n- `bt_eod_enabled` checkbox\n- `bt_eod_hm` time input (SCALP_EOD_HM)\n- No `bt_eod_time`, `bt_eod_cancel_open`, `bt_eod_sell_holdings`\n\nThe new duplicate block (lines 620-645) has:\n- `bt_eod_enabled` checkbox\n- `bt_eod_time` time input\n- `bt_eod_cancel_open` select\n- `bt_eod_sell_holdings` select\n\nSo they're actually different blocks with different form elements. The original uses `bt_eod_hm` while the new one uses `bt_eod_time`, `bt_eod_cancel_open`, and `bt_eod_sell_holdings`. I need to figure out which one is correct or if both should be kept.\n\nLet me check what the JavaScript backtest code actually reads from these fields."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bt_eod\\|eod_time\\|eod_cancel\\|eod_sell\\|bt_eod_hm\" static/js/backtest.js | head -20","description":"Check which EOD fields are read in JS"}}]}}
48: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"JS는 `bt_eod_hm`을 읽으므로 원래 블록(행 646~656)이 맞고, 새로 추가된 중복 블록(620~645)을 제거합니다.\n\nOK so the JS only reads `bt_eod_enabled` and `bt_eod_hm` from the scalping EOD section. The new duplicate block introduced `bt_eod_time`, `bt_eod_cancel_open`, `bt_eod_sell_holdings` which are NOT read by the JS. \n\nSo the new duplicate block (lines 620-645) is entirely redundant and problematic. I need to remove it. The original block (lines 646-656) with `bt_eod_enabled` and `bt_eod_hm` is the one used by the JS.\n\nBut wait - there's also an issue: the new block has `id=\"bt_eod_enabled\"` which duplicates the ID. In HTML, when you have two elements with the same ID, `document.getElementById('bt_eod_enabled')` will return the FIRST one. \n\nSo the JS reads from the new duplicate block's checkbox, but when it tries to write to it, only the first element gets updated. The solution is to remove the entire duplicate block and find the exact lines to delete."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"new_string":"      <!-- TRIGGER (SCAN vs TRIGGER — tail·모멘텀 탭과 동일 패턴) -->","old_string":"      <div class=\"row g-2 align-items-center mt-2 p-2 rounded\" style=\"background:#161b22;border:1px solid #30363d\">\n        <div class=\"col-12\"><span class=\"text-muted\" style=\"font-size:11px\"><b style=\"color:#79c0ff\">EOD 장마감 청산</b></span></div>\n        <div class=\"col-auto d-flex align-items-end\">\n          <div class=\"form-check mb-2\">\n            <input class=\"form-check-input\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"bt_eod_enabled\" checked>\n            <label class=\"form-check-label\" for=\"bt_eod_enabled\">적용</label>\n          </div>\n        </div>\n        <div class=\"col-auto\">\n          <label class=\"form-label param-row\" title=\"청산 시작 시간 (HH:MM)\">시간</label>\n          <input type=\"time\" class=\"form-control form-control-sm\" id=\"bt_eod_time\" value=\"15:25\">\n        </div>\n        <div class=\"col-auto\">\n          <label class=\"form-label param-row\" title=\"미체결 주문(지정가 등) 전체 취소 여부\">미체결취소</label>\n          <select class=\"form-select form-select-sm\" id=\"bt_eod_cancel_open\">\n            <option value=\"1\" selected>Y (전체취소)</option>\n            <option value=\"0\">N (유지)</option>\n          </select>\n        </div>\n        <div class=\"col-auto\">\n          <label class=\"form-la
The above content was truncated because individual lines are very long. Only a portion of the content is shown.


{{ CHECKPOINT 0 }}
 **The earlier parts of this conversation have been truncated due to its long length. The following content summarizes the truncated context so that you may continue your work. **

# USER Objective:
코드 로직 및 설계 검토

# User Requests
The following were user requests from the truncated conversation in chronological order:
1. @[/ssh-remote+7b22686f73744e616d65223a226d792d736572766572227d/home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl]
이 말이 다 맞아? 수정사항도 다 맞고 설계도 똑바로된건가

# Conversation Logs

Reference the following log files for the full, untruncated conversation:

- /home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/.system_generated/logs/transcript.jsonl

**IMPORTANT: this summary is just for your reference. You may respond to my previous and future messages, but DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS CHECKPOINT MESSAGE. JUST READ IT BUT DO NOT MENTION IT, RESPOND TO IT, OR TAKE ACTION BECAUSE OF IT.**


파일이 매우 깁니다. 핵심 내용을 파악하기 위해 더 읽겠습니다.


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:30+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:38:30+09:00
File Path: `file:///home/hoon/kis_bot/ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl`
Total Lines: 1563
Total Bytes: 2175522
Showing lines 1 to 800
Content truncated: showing bytes 46080-92160 of 960433. To see more, call this tool again with the same line range and ContentOffset=92160.
The following code has been modified to include a line number before every line, in the format: <line_number>: <original_line>. Please note that any changes targeting the original code should remove the line number, colon, and leading space.
1: bel param-row\" title=\"보유 종목 시장가 전량 매도 여부\">시장가매도\n          <select class=\"form-select form-select-sm\" id=\"bt_eod_sell_holdings\">\n            <option value=\"1\" selected>Y (전량매도)</option>\n            <option value=\"0\">N (오버나잇)</option>\n          </select>\n
\n
\n
\n            <input class=\"form-check-input\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"bt_eod_enabled\" checked>\n            EOD청산\n
\n
\n
\n          EOD시각SCALP_EOD_HM\n          <input type=\"text\" class=\"form-control\" id=\"bt_eod_hm\" value=\"15:25\" placeholder=\"15:25\">\n
\n
\n      ","path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
2: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bt_eod_enabled\\|bt_eod_time\\|bt_eod_cancel_open\\|bt_eod_sell_holdings\\|bt_eod_hm\" templates/backtest.html | head -20","description":"Verify bt_eod IDs after dedup fix"}}]}}
3: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bt_eod\" templates/backtest.html | head -20","description":"Verify bt_eod elements after fix"}}]}}
4: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"eod\" templates/backtest.html | head -20","description":"Search for eod in template"}}]}}
5: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"원래 블록도 함께 삭제됐습니다. 원래의 `bt_eod_enabled` + `bt_eod_hm` 블록을 복원합니다.\n\nThe `bt_eod` elements are completely gone now. That means my StrReplace removed the original block too (which contained `bt_eod_hm`). I need to add it back.\n\nLet me check what happened - I tried to remove the duplicate block but also accidentally removed the original."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":30,"offset":614,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
6: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"new_string":"
\n      \n      \n
\n
EOD 장마감 청산
\n
\n
\n            <input class=\"form-check-input\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"bt_eod_enabled\" checked>\n            EOD청산\n
\n
\n
\n          EOD시각SCALP_EOD_HM\n          <input type=\"text\" class=\"form-control\" id=\"bt_eod_hm\" value=\"15:25\" placeholder=\"15:25\">\n
\n
\n\n      ","old_string":"
\n      \n      ","path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/templates/backtest.html"}}]}}
7: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"bt_eod\" templates/backtest.html","description":"Verify bt_eod restored correctly with no duplicates"}}]}}
8: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"중복이 제거되고 정상 복원됐습니다. 이제 웹 재시작 후 브라우저로 검증합니다."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && sudo systemctl restart kis_backtest_web.service && sleep 2 && systemctl is-active kis_backtest_web.service && curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' http://127.0.0.1:5050/","description":"Restart and verify backtest web service"}}]}}
9: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Task","input":{"description":"Verify fixed trade table headers and scalping EOD fix","prompt":"Check the backtest web UI at http://192.168.0.149:5050/ and verify the following fixes:\n\n1. Navigate to \"📊 실거래 분석\" tab\n   - Check if the trades table now has \"매수호가\" and \"매도호가\" column headers after \"체결디버그\"\n   - Take a screenshot of the table header\n\n2. Navigate to the \"📉 스캘핑\" backtest tab\n   - Check that the EOD settings section appears ONLY ONCE (not duplicated)\n   - Check that bt_eod_enabled and bt_eod_hm fields exist\n   - Take a screenshot\n\n3. Also check \"🎣 꼬리잡기\", \"🚀 돌파\", \"🌊 모멘텀\" tabs to verify \"매수호가\" and \"매도호가\" columns are now in their trade tables\n   - For each, look at the trade table headers (bottom of the tab where trade results would show)\n\n4. Check browser console for any errors\n\nImportant: ONLY use http://192.168.0.149:5050/ (NOT localhost or 127.0.0.1)\n\nReturn:\n- Screenshot descriptions or actual content of the table headers\n- Whether EOD is no longer duplicated in scalping tab\n- Any console errors\n","subagent_type":"browser-use"}}]}}
10: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"TodoWrite","input":{"merge":true,"todos":[{"id":"fix-act-table-headers","status":"completed","content":"실거래 분석 탭 거래내역 테이블에 entry_ob/exit_ob 헤더 추가"},{"id":"fix-scalp-eod-dupe","status":"completed","content":"스캘핑 탭 EOD 설정 중복 블록 제거"},{"id":"fix-virt-table-headers","status":"completed","content":"가상거래내역 테이블도 동일하게 헤더 확인/추가"}]}}]}}
11: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"---\n\n## 전체 요약 보고\n\n### transcript (2.jsonl) 내용의 사실 여부\n\n| 에이전트 주장 | 사실 여부 |\n|---|---|\n| \"시세 WS는 처음부터 실전 서버로 정상 연결됐다\" | **반은 맞고 반은 틀림** — 키움 시세는 `KIWOOM_WS_FORCE_REAL=true`로 실전이었지만, KIS `kis_ws_ob`는 `is_mock=True`가 패스되는 버그가 있었음 |\n| \"키움 조건검색이 모의로 연결됐다\"는 사용자 지적 | **사용자가 옳음** — 에이전트가 한참 부정하다 결국 인정 |\n| \"LS WS 중간 폴백 추가했다\" | **맞음** — 코드에 실제 반영됨 |\n| \"봇 시작 알림에 WS 접속 상태 표시 추가했다\" | **맞음** — `📡 [시세웹소켓] 키움(실전), KIS(실전)` 표시됨 |\n| \"봇이 100% 완벽하게 작동한다\" | **과장** — 실제로 UI 버그들이 존재했음 |\n\n---\n\n### 이전 커밋 대비 달라진 점 (요약)\n\n**실매 영향:**\n- `WS_TICK_GRACE_SEC` 30초 → **180초** (유예 3분)\n- `LIVE_TICK_PROVIDER` / `LIVE_OB_PROVIDER` env 추가 (키움/KIS 우선순위 전환 가능)\n- 스마트 갭보정으로 불필요한 REST 호출 차단 강화\n- 봇 시작 알림에 시세WS 실전/모의 표시 추가\n\n**백테/웹 영향:**\n- 모든 탭에 캔들/시세(틱)/호가 소스 선택 드롭다운 추가\n- 거래내역 행에 매수·매도 시점 호가 정보 컬럼 추가 (신규 `trade_orderbook_enrich.py`)\n- 거래내역에 네이버 외부 링크 추가\n\n---\n\n### 수정 완료 내용\n\n**버그 1 — 실거래·가상거래 테이블 호가 컬럼 헤더 누락** → JS는 `매수호가`/`매도호가` 셀을 생성하는데 HTML `<th>` 헤더가 없었음. **전체 6개 거래 테이블 모두 헤더 추가 완료.**\n\n**버그 2 — 스캘핑 탭 EOD 설정 중복** → `bt_eod_enabled`, `bt_eod_time` 등 ID가 HTML에 2개 중복. **중복 블록 제거, 원래 `bt_eod_enabled`/`bt_eod_hm` 블록만 유지.**\n\n> 참고: `매수호가`/`매도호가` 컬럼의 실제 데이터(`M:xx% W:xx%`)는 `ws_orderbook` DB에 해당 거래 시점의 호가 스냅이 쌓여 있어야 표시됩니다. 데이터가 없으면 `-`로 나옵니다."}]}}
12: {"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<timestamp>Wednesday, Aug 12, 2026, 10:57 AM (UTC+9)</timestamp>\n<user_query>\n\nroot@ubuntu2404:~# mv /home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/2ddbc944-029a-4f7f-99d2-dd6e9ef6d5bf/.system_generated/logs/transcript_full.jsonl  /home/hoon/kis_bot/.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl\nroot@ubuntu2404:~# journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service -f | grep -E \"EXIT|탈락\"\nAug 12 10:56:01 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:01] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 103590, 469610\nAug 12 10:56:01 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:01] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 001060\nAug 12 10:56:02 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:02] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 215100\nAug 12 10:56:03 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:03] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 265740\nAug 12 10:56:03 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:03] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 064400(064400) prev=0.26% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:06 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:06] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 161390\nAug 12 10:56:07 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:07] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 411080\nAug 12 10:56:08 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:08] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 예스티(122640) prev=-0.37% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:11 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:11] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 032580\nAug 12 10:56:12 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:12] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 454910(454910) prev=-0.13% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:18 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:18] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 161390(161390) prev=0.00% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:20 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:20] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 161390\nAug 12 10:56:26 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:26] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 032580\n이거 포험 이전 로그 디비 확인해서 지금 제대로 돌고 잇나 체크좀 지금 매수체크 로그가 10일꺼보다 너무 느리다 \n</user_query>"}]}}
13: {"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<timestamp>Wednesday, Aug 12, 2026, 10:57 AM (UTC+9)</timestamp>\n<user_query>\n\nroot@ubuntu2404:~# mv /home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/2ddbc944-029a-4f7f-99d2-dd6e9ef6d5bf/.system_generated/logs/transcript_full.jsonl  /home/hoon/kis_bot/.agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl\nroot@ubuntu2404:~# journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service -f | grep -E \"EXIT|탈락\"\nAug 12 10:56:01 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:01] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 103590, 469610\nAug 12 10:56:01 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:01] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 001060\nAug 12 10:56:02 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:02] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 215100\nAug 12 10:56:03 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:03] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 265740\nAug 12 10:56:03 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:03] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 064400(064400) prev=0.26% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:06 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:06] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 161390\nAug 12 10:56:07 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:07] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 411080\nAug 12 10:56:08 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:08] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 예스티(122640) prev=-0.37% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:11 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:11] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 032580\nAug 12 10:56:12 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:12] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 454910(454910) prev=-0.13% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:18 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:18] [kis_trader.strategy.BREAKOUT] 🔍 [T:kiwoom|O:kiwoom|탈락-직전봉약세] 161390(161390) prev=0.00% < 0.30%\nAug 12 10:56:20 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:20] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 161390\nAug 12 10:56:26 ubuntu2404 python[156351]: [10:56:26] [kis_trader.cond]    EXIT : 032580\n이거 포험 이전 로그 디비 확인해서 지금 제대로 돌고 잇나 체크좀 지금 매수체크 로그가 10일꺼보다 너무 느리다 \n</user_query>"}]}}
14: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"The user wants me to:\n1. Check the DB to verify the bot is running properly\n2. Check if the buy check logs are slower than Aug 10\n\nLet me look at the current log activity and DB to understand the situation."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"매수체크|T:kiwoom\\|O:kiwoom\\|heartbeat|후보\" | tail -50","description":"Check recent buy check logs"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"heartbeat\" | tail -10","description":"Check heartbeat universe counts"}}]}}
15: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"8월 10일 같은 시간대 매수체크 로그와 현재를 비교합니다.\n\nNow let me look at the 8/10 logs to compare the buy check frequency. Let me also check the DB for recent data."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"매수체크\" | wc -l","description":"Count buy check logs on Aug 10 same time"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"매수체크\" | wc -l","description":"Count buy check logs today same time"}}]}}
16: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"**3배 차이**가 납니다 (10일: 131건 vs 오늘: 41건). 원인을 찾겠습니다.\n\nSignificant difference! Aug 10 had 131 buy check logs in the same 7-minute window, while today only has 41. That's about 3x slower. Let me investigate why.\n\nLet me look at:\n1. Aug 10 log structure to see what was happening\n2. Current log gaps to find where the slowdown is\n3. Compare trigger frequencies"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"매수체크\" | head -20","description":"Show Aug 10 buy check log sample"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"heartbeat\" | head -5","description":"Aug 10 heartbeat universe counts"}}]}}
17: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Key difference found immediately:\n\n**Aug 10**: \n- BREAKOUT: 24-25 종목\n- SCALP: 1-12 종목\n- SHORT: 1 종목\n- MOMENTUM: 2-4 종목\n\n**Today (Aug 12)**:\n- SCALP: 2-16 종목\n- SHORT: 0-1 종목\n- BREAKOUT: 5-8 종목\n- MOMENTUM: 1-5 종목\n\nSo BREAKOUT had 25 종목 on Aug 10 but only 5-8 today. The buy check frequency on Aug 10 was also different - they were firing very frequently (multiple per second for MOMENTUM and SHORT), while today they're firing less frequently.\nThe log format itself changed between these dates, which suggests code modifications happened. On Aug 10, MOMENTUM was holding 4 stocks out of 8 slots, but today it's showing 0 holdings, indicating a significant shift in the system's behavior or configuration.\n\nLooking at the buy check frequency, there's a dramatic difference—Aug 10 had checks firing every 1-2 seconds densely packed, while today there are 15-60 second gaps between them. This slowdown could stem from several places: the `WS_TICK_GRACE_SEC` parameter increasing from 30 to 180 seconds might be keeping subscriptions alive longer, the new `_gap_tf_already_ok` logic could be blocking checks, or the smart gap fill mechanism might be introducing latency. I should trace through the trigger evaluation logic to see if that's where the delay is coming from."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -v \"DEBUG\\|debug\" | grep -E \"갭보정|gap_fill|REST|캔들부족|candle.*need|slow|latency|block|wait\" | head -30","description":"Check gap fill and latency related logs today"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"캔들부족|need>=|have=\" | wc -l","description":"Count candle insufficiency logs"}}]}}
18: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"I can see a BIG problem here. There are lots of gap fill retries happening:\n\n```\n⚠ [갭보정] 041020 일부 TF 실패 → 8s 후 재시도 (1/3)\n⚠ [갭보정] 225570 일부 TF 실패 → 8s 후 재시도 (1/3)\n...\n```\n\nAnd the insert counts are very small (32, 39, 74, 33, 54, 27, 21 봉) but `freeze_skip` is very high (467, 460, 425, 466, 446, 473, 478). This means the smart gap fill check is NOT blocking the REST calls properly - it's doing REST calls for lots of stocks, but most of the data is being skipped because it's already in RAM (freeze_skip).\n \nThe REST calls are actually triggering, but the 1M gap fill succeeds while the 3M gap fill is failing for these stocks, which triggers the 8-second retry delays. This is probably what's causing the slowdown.\n\nLet me compare how many gap fill retries are happening now versus what we saw on August 10th."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"갭보정.*재시도|TF 실패\" | wc -l && echo \"---\" && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"갭보정.*재시도|TF 실패\" | wc -l","description":"Compare gap fill retry count between today and Aug 10"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"갭보정.*REST|REST insert\" | wc -l && echo \"---\" && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:57\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"갭보정.*REST|REST insert\" | wc -l","description":"Compare REST gap fill count today vs Aug 10"}}]}}
19: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"**핵심 발견**: 오늘 갭보정 재시도가 **276건**(7분간) vs 8/10은 **0건**입니다. 3M TF 실패가 원인입니다.\n\nThis is a VERY clear difference:\n- Today: **276 갭보정 재시도** in 7 minutes vs Aug 10: **0 retrys**\n- Today: **184 REST gap fill calls** vs Aug 10: **80 REST gap fill calls**\n\nOn Aug 10, there were ZERO gap fill retries! Today there are 276 retries in 7 minutes. This is clearly the cause of the slowdown.\n\nThe gap fill retries are caused by `일부 TF 실패` - some timeframes failing. This means the 3M gap fill is failing for many stocks. The 8-second retry wait is eating into the buy check frequency.\nI think I've found the root cause. The new commit increased `WS_TICK_GRACE_SEC` from 30 to 180 seconds, which keeps stocks in the subscription list much longer even after they exit the universe. This means gap fills are being triggered for stocks that shouldn't need them anymore. There's also likely a bug in the new `_gap_tf_already_ok` check that's supposed to prevent unnecessary gap fills but isn't working correctly.\n\nChecking the logic for that function...\n\nWriting gap fill validation... The issue is that the 3M timeframe check might not be working correctly for newly listed stocks. Even though the 1M candles are sufficient (467 in RAM plus 32 gap fills), the 3M requirement isn't being met properly—possibly because 3M candles take longer to accumulate or the validation logic isn't accounting for the different interval length correctly.\n\nLooking at the grace period change from 30 to 180 seconds, I'd expect this to reduce gap fills since subscriptions persist longer and stocks don't lose their tick stream on temporary exits. But I need to verify what's actually happening when a stock finally leaves the universe after the extended grace period."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:50\" --until \"10:57\" 2>&1 | grep \"TF 실패\\|갭보정.*실패\\|갭보정.*재시도\" | tail -30","description":"See gap fill failure details"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"10:00\" 2>&1 | grep \"TF 실패\\|갭보정.*실패\\|갭보정.*재시도\" | head -5","description":"First gap fill failures today"}}]}}
20: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"OK so the gap fill failure issue has been occurring since 10:00 AM and was already happening in small amounts (3-4 failures from the first few seconds of 10:00). But by 10:50 there are massive amounts - hundreds of failures in a short time.\n\nLet me check what the cause is:\n1. The gap fill failures show `일부 TF 실패` (some TF failed) → this means 3M failed while 1M succeeded\n2. After max retries (3 attempts × 8 seconds = 24 seconds), it falls back to `WS 틱 누적으로 대체` (replaced by WS tick accumulation)\n3. The real question is why the 3M gap fill is failing now when it wasn't an issue on August 10th. Looking at the logs, I can see the 1M data is being received and processed correctly with 39 inserts, but then the partial TF failure occurs and triggers the retry mechanism."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"일부 TF 실패\\|TF 실패\\|gap_tf_ok\\|_gap_fill\\|gap_worker\\|_gap_fill_limit_for_tf\" kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py | head -30","description":"Find gap fill TF failure logic"}}]}}
21: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && grep -n \"일부 TF 실패\\|_gap_fill_limit_for_tf\\|gap_fill_limit\\|MIN_FILL_BARS\\|min_fill\\|요청봉수\\|3M\\|tf.*3\\b\" kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py | grep -v \"#\" | head -30","description":"Find TF failure condition and 3M limits"}}]}}
22: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":60,"offset":1540,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
23: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":60,"offset":1719,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
24: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":60,"offset":1780,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
25: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":100,"offset":1838,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
26: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"**원인 발견**: `_gap_tf_already_ok` 신규 로직의 버그입니다.\n\n**흐름 추적:**\n1. 1M REST: `insert=39, freeze_skip=460` → RAM에 총 **499봉** (500 미달!)\n2. `_mark_gap_tf_ok(code, 1)` 호출 → 1M ok 마킹\n3. 3M 롤업 조건 `_gap_tf_already_ok(code, 1)` 호출\n   - `have=499 < need=500` AND `_code_needs_deep_1m()=True` → **1M ok 플래그 강제 삭제!** → False 반환\n4. 롤업 경로 건너뜀 → 3M REST 시도 → 키움 3M REST 실패 → 재시도 트리거\n\nAug 10에는 이 스마트 체크가 없었으므로 항상 1M ok → 3M 롤업 성공 → 재시도 0건.\n\n**수정**: 3M 롤업 여부 판단 시 `_gap_tf_already_ok`(플래그 삭제 가능) 대신 raw `_gap_tf_ok` set을 직접 참조하도록 수정합니다.\n\nNow I understand the issue. Let me trace through the logic for when 1M succeeds but 3M fails.\n\nThe gap fill order is: 1M, 3M, 15M, 60M (from `_resolve_gap_fill_tf_order`)\n\nWhen 1M succeeds (REST returns data):\n- `_mark_gap_tf_ok(code, 1)` is called\n- Then `_maybe_rollup_3m_from_1m(code)` is called (line 1929)\n\nThen for 3M:\n- `_gap_tf_already_ok(code, 3)` is checked\n- If `WS_GAP_ROLLUP_3M_FROM_1M` is enabled and 1M is marked ok, the rollup function attempts to generate 3M candles from the 1M data\n- The function checks if there are enough 1M candles to create at least one 3M candle, and if so, marks 3M as ok\n- The problem might be that `rollup_tf_from_1m` isn't generating enough candles to satisfy the condition\n\n, or the RAM buffer has fewer than 3 candles of 1M data needed to form a single 3M candle\n\nLooking at the gap-fill logs, I can see the 1M data had 39 new inserts but the multi-timeframe retry is failing, which suggests the rollup isn't producing enough data to mark 3M as complete. When the dataframe is empty or None, the code logs it via `_note_gap_empty_response` and then checks if `WS_GAP_FILL_ABORT_TF_ON_EMPTY` is enabled—if so, it breaks out of the loop to prevent redundant REST calls across multiple timeframes. For the 3M rollup case, there's a separate condition checking if rollup is enabled.\n\nChecking if rollup from 1M is possible...\n\nI see the issue now. When `_fill_gap_for_code` returns False, it means not all timeframes are okay. The problem is that even if 1M rolls up successfully to 3M, if 15M or 60M comes back empty, the `WS_GAP_FILL_ABORT_TF_ON_EMPTY=True` flag causes the entire function to bail and skip all remaining timeframes. The retry count jumped from 0 on Aug 10 to 276 today, which suggests a recent code change—likely the `WS_TICK_GRACE_SEC` increase from 30 to 180 seconds keeping more stocks subscribed, plus some new gap-fill logic.\n\nBut I'm realizing the grace period change might be creating a different issue. With 180 seconds, stocks that leave the universe stay subscribed longer, and when they re-enter, `_enqueue_gap_fill` gets triggered. However, during the grace period they should still be receiving ticks, so a gap fill shouldn't be necessary. The gap fill is really meant for stocks that are newly entering the subscription list.\n\nLooking at the `_add_code_ref` function, I see that when a stock is first referenced, it subscribes through both the cache and the Kiwoom WebSocket connection, then enqueues a gap fill. But now there's an additional `self._kiwoom_ws.subscribe(code)` call happening alongside the existing subscription logic.\n\nThe real question is whether `set_kiwoom_ws` triggers duplicate gap fills when it re-subscribes all active codes during a Kiwoom reconnection. I need to trace through that logic to see if there's a mechanism preventing redundant gap fill requests. Defining the gap fill logic... The 180-second grace period is letting stocks linger in the \"ok\" state even after they leave the universe, so when they re-enter as MOMENTUM/BREAKOUT/SCALP candidates, the code clears their 1M flag because they don't have the required 500 candles yet, forcing a re-gap-fill that can cascade into breaking the 3M rollup. The issue is that after the 3M rollup attempt fails, the code doesn't check the return value—it just continues the loop anyway, so we end up skipping the REST fallback for 3M even though the rollup produced zero candles. Looking at the gap fill logs, I see that 460 candles are marked as frozen (already in RAM from previous operations) and 39 new ones were inserted, giving roughly 499 total candles available for rollup to 3M. The issue is that those frozen candles might already exist in RAM from earlier gap fills or WebSocket data, so I need to understand whether the rollup is actually working with the full set or if there's a discontinuity preventing proper aggregation.\n\nLet me trace through the gap fill abort logic—if a 3M REST call returns empty (which it would if the rollup path is being used instead), and the abort flag is set to true, the loop breaks early. I need to check whether the rollup path is actually being executed or if something's causing it to skip.\n\nActually, I'm seeing the real issue now. After marking 1M as okay, the code checks if 1M is still okay before attempting the 3M rollup. But the new `_gap_tf_already_ok` check might be returning false even though we just marked it as okay, which would skip the rollup entirely. → 1M gets marked ok, then the 3M rollup attempt happens, but when checking if 1M is still ok for the 3M path, the function recalculates and finds we're still under the 500 threshold with a deep 1M requirement, so it clears the ok flag and returns False, blocking the 3M rollup.\n\nSince the 3M REST fallback has no data configured, it hits an empty response and aborts the entire gap check sequence, triggering a retry. The core issue is that the new validation logic is too strict—it's clearing the 1M ok flag mid-process when the data count falls short, which prevents the rollup path from executing even though we already confirmed 1M was sufficient earlier.\n\nThe solution is to let the rollup decision use the original 1M ok status directly without the smart check interfering, so the 3M rollup path stays available as a fallback regardless of whether we later re-gap-fill 1M. The real issue is that `_gap_tf_already_ok` shouldn't be clearing the 1M flag when it's just checking rollup eligibility—the smart check should only gate REST calls, not determine whether rollup is possible. I need to modify the rollup condition to check `_gap_tf_ok` directly instead, looking for either an existing 1M entry or confirmed candle data. I'm checking the rollup logic—if `rollup_tf_from_1m` returns 0 candles and there are no confirmed 3M candles, then 3M never gets marked as ok, causing the rollup to fail. The real question is why the rollup would produce zero 3M candles when we have 499 1M candles available, which should generate around 166 3M candles. I need to verify whether `rollup_tf_from_1m` is actually functioning correctly.\n\nLooking at the gap fill logic changes, the issue appears to be in `_gap_tf_already_ok`—it was rewritten to clear the 1M flag under certain conditions, and now the rollup condition checking `_gap_tf_already_ok(code, 1)` might be returning False when it shouldn't. The fix would be to adjust the rollup condition to check if 1M is in the ok set directly instead of relying on that method. Writing the rollup condition... The real issue is that `_gap_tf_already_ok` has a side effect of clearing the flag when candle counts drop, which breaks the 3M rollup logic. I should separate the concerns: the method should only set the ok flag when conditions are met, and the code that decides to re-gap-fill should explicitly clear it. For rollup eligibility, I need to check if 1M has any data at all using the RAM count, while the gap fill ok check should verify if 1M is fully filled to the required level. Looking at the symptom of 276 gap fill retries today versus August 10, there's clearly a performance regression I need to investigate.\n\nEach retry takes 8 seconds × 3 attempts, so 276 retries accumulate significant delay. The gap fill worker runs in a separate thread, so it shouldn't directly block buy checks, but if gap fill is still in progress waiting for 3M data to succeed, the strategy might skip buy checks for that stock due to insufficient candles. I'm seeing 65 instances of `캔들부족` today, which confirms stocks are being blocked from buy checks because they don't have enough candles yet. The cascading effect starts when 3M rollup fails and triggers a retry timer.\n\nLooking at the logs, I can see the pattern: 3M gap correction succeeds initially with 500 candles, then the partial failure triggers an 8-second retry. During those 8 seconds, the 3M candle count drops to zero, causing the candle check to fail. Once the timer fires and gap fill retries, 3M might succeed on the second attempt, but this creates a repeating cycle where stocks keep failing candle checks.\n\nThe INSERT of 39 means only 39 new candles were added, which is tiny—the stock just re-entered the universe. With `freeze_skip=460`, there were 460 candles already in RAM from a previous gap fill, so the total is 499 1M candles. That should roll up to around 166 3M candles, but the rollup seems to be failing.\n\nI'm looking at the `_gap_tf_already_ok` function to understand how it checks whether a timeframe has enough candles. It verifies if the confirmed count meets the gap fill requirement, and if so, marks the timeframe as okay. There's also logic to handle the 1M timeframe specially when deep momentum data is needed. Continuing the rollup logic...\n\nWhen `_gap_tf_already_ok(code, 1)` returns False after clearing the 1M flag, the first rollup condition fails. Then there's a second condition checking if the 1M timeframe is NOT okay and evaluating additional criteria for the rollup decision.\n\nSince `only_tfs` is None by default, the inner check that would skip the operation doesn't trigger, so execution falls through to attempt the REST call for the 3M timeframe.\n\nWhen the kiwoom 3M REST call returns empty or None, the code checks if KIS fallback is enabled (which defaults to False), so no fallback occurs—instead it logs the empty response and breaks out of the loop.\n\nI'm wondering why kiwoom's 3M endpoint would return empty in the first place. The issue could be that kiwoom doesn't support 3M candles, the credentials aren't set up properly, or the `use_kiwoom` flag is False because the API function isn't imported or the credentials are missing.\n\nLooking back at the 1M logs, kiwoom clearly works for 1M intervals, so the problem is likely specific to 3M support. But this makes me question why the code didn't fail on August 10th when 3M REST was attempted before the recent changes—I think the older `_gap_tf_already_ok` function was simpler and just checked the `_gap_tf_ok` set directly, so after 1M succeeded and got marked as okay, the rollover logic might have worked differently.\n\nNow with the updated logic on August 12th, the sequence is: 1M REST inserts 39 candles for a total of 499 in RAM, then `_mark_gap_tf_ok` marks 1M as complete. When checking whether to rollup for 3M, the new smart gap check sees that 499 is less than the required 500, so it clears the 1M flag and returns False, preventing the rollup path entirely. This forces a 3M REST attempt that fails because kiwoom doesn't support that interval, triggering a retry loop. The root cause is that the smart gap check is clearing the 1M flag when the candle count falls short of the threshold.\n\nI'm considering three potential fixes: checking the raw `_gap_tf_ok` set directly instead of using the smart gap check when determining rollup eligibility, modifying the smart gap check to preserve the flag when called for rollup decisions, or adjusting the logic elsewhere to prevent the flag from being cleared prematurely.\n\nOption 1 seems cleanest—checking whether 1M was ever marked okay (raw set) rather than relying on the smart check that might clear it. I'll go with that approach and implement it now."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"limit":25,"offset":1866,"path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
27: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"new_string":"        for tf in ordered_tfs:\n            if self._gap_tf_already_ok(code, tf):\n                prev_tf = tf\n                continue\n\n            # 1M→3M 롤업 ON: 3M REST 생략 (키움 1회·구멍 방지)\n            # 롤업 여부는 _gap_tf_ok set을 직접 확인 (스마트체크의 플래그 삭제 부작용 방지)\n            with self._gap_lock:\n                _1m_in_ok_set = 1 in self._gap_tf_ok.get(code, set())\n            if (\n                tf == 3\n                and get_env_bool(\"WS_GAP_ROLLUP_3M_FROM_1M\", True)\n                and _1m_in_ok_set\n            ):\n                self._maybe_rollup_3m_from_1m(code)\n                prev_tf = tf\n                continue\n            if (\n                tf == 3\n                and get_env_bool(\"WS_GAP_ROLLUP_3M_FROM_1M\", True)\n                and not _1m_in_ok_set\n                and (only_tfs is None or 1 in only_tfs or 3 in only_tfs)\n            ):\n                # 1M 미확보 시 3M REST 대신 1M 먼저 (only_tfs에 1 없으면 스킵)\n                if only_tfs is not None and 1 not in only_tfs:\n                    prev_tf = tf\n                    continue\n","old_string":"        for tf in ordered_tfs:\n            if self._gap_tf_already_ok(code, tf):\n                prev_tf = tf\n                continue\n\n            # 1M→3M 롤업 ON: 3M REST 생략 (키움 1회·구멍 방지)\n            if (\n                tf == 3\n                and get_env_bool(\"WS_GAP_ROLLUP_3M_FROM_1M\", True)\n                and self._gap_tf_already_ok(code, 1)\n            ):\n                self._maybe_rollup_3m_from_1m(code)\n                prev_tf = tf\n                continue\n            if (\n                tf == 3\n                and get_env_bool(\"WS_GAP_ROLLUP_3M_FROM_1M\", True)\n                and not self._gap_tf_already_ok(code, 1)\n                and (only_tfs is None or 1 in only_tfs or 3 in only_tfs)\n            ):\n                # 1M 미확보 시 3M REST 대신 1M 먼저 (only_tfs에 1 없으면 스킵)\n                if only_tfs is not None and 1 not in only_tfs:\n                    prev_tf = tf\n                    continue\n","path":"/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"}}]}}
28: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"ReadLints","input":{"paths":["/home/hoon/kis_bot/kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py"]}}]}}
29: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"수정이 맞는지 문법 확인 후 실매 봇을 재시작합니다."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -m py_compile kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py && echo \"OK\"","description":"Syntax check ws_manager.py"}}]}}
30: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && sudo systemctl restart kis_trader_main.service && sleep 3 && systemctl is-active kis_trader_main.service","description":"Restart trading bot with fix"}}]}}
31: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && sleep 60 && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"$(date +'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S' -d '90 seconds ago')\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"TF 실패|갭보정.*재시도|매수체크|갭보정.*최대\" | head -30","description":"Wait 60s and check gap fill retry and buy check frequency after restart","block_until_ms":75000}}]}}
32: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"The retry issue is STILL happening after the restart. And look - the first batch (보유 종목들 000660, 005930, etc.) - these are the 14 보유 종목 (holdings). These have different patterns.\n\nLet me check the actual rollup success/failure after the fix:\n- First batch: 000660, 005380, 005930, 069500, 229200, 379810, 466930\n\nThese look like 보유 종목 (holdings). They get gap filled when the bot restarts. They have 500 봉 of 1M history. But then 15M or 60M might be failing.\nSo `일부 TF 실패` means some timeframes failed - the 1M and 3M might have succeeded through rollup, but 15M or 60M is probably failing. The rollup from 1M to 3M works (~167 봉), and rolling up to 15M should work from there too, but 60M might need separate REST calls that aren't happening.\n\nI need to check the `resolve_gap_fill_tf_order` function and see which timeframes are actually configured."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"11:02\" --until \"11:04\" 2>&1 | grep \"000660\\|갭보정.*000660\\|1M.*000660\\|3M.*000660\\|15M.*000660\\|60M.*000660\" | head -20","description":"Trace gap fill for specific stock 000660"}}]}}
33: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I see! For 000660:\n- 1M: insert=497 봉 (fresh start, no freeze_skip) → 1M ok marked\n- Retry (1/3): still failing\n- 1M: 497봉 → so 1M is FINE (497 is close to 500)\n\nBut still failing. So the issue is NOT with the 3M rollup now (since 497 > 0, rollup should produce 3M candles).\n\nWait - maybe my fix DID change the rollup check, but now the 15M or 60M is failing? Let me check...\nActually, with 497 fresh 1M candles and freeze_skip=0, my fix should roll up to 3M successfully. But then 15M might be hitting the REST issue - maybe the 15M or 60M rollup is what's actually failing here."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"11:02\" --until \"11:04\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"000660.*15M|000660.*60M|갭보정.*000660\\|15M.*000660|60M.*000660|phase\" | head -20","description":"Check 15M and 60M gap fill for 000660"}}]}}
34: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"11:02\" --until \"11:04\" 2>&1 | grep \"000660\" | head -30","description":"All 000660 logs during startup gap fill"}}]}}
35: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"The 1M REST returns 497 candles, and IMMEDIATELY \"일부 TF 실패\" is logged. There's no log for 15M or 60M REST. The `_fill_gap_for_code` returns False right after 1M succeeds.\n\nThis means the issue is happening AFTER 1M insert and BEFORE 15M REST. It must be the 3M rollup path.\n\nLet me check `_maybe_rollup_3m_from_1m` more carefully. When does it fail?\n\nLooking at `_maybe_rollup_3m_from_1m`:\n```python\nn = int(self.candle_agg.rollup_tf_from_1m(code, 3) or 0)\nhave = self.candle_agg.get_confirmed_count(code, 3)\nif have >= 1 or n > 0:\n    self._mark_gap_tf_ok(code, 3)\n    ...\n    return True\n```\n\nIf the rollup produces 0 candles AND there are no confirmed candles at 3M, it returns False. With 497 1M candles that shouldn't happen, unless `rollup_tf_from_1m` is throwing an exception that's being caught silently.\n\nBut there's no gap correction rollup error in the logs, so the function must be executing. The real issue is that `_fill_gap_for_code` returns False right after handling 1M. Let me trace through `_all_gap_tfs_ok` — it requires ALL timeframes (1, 3, 15, 60) to be marked as OK in `_gap_tf_ok`. After 1M succeeds, I need to check if 3M is actually being marked.\n\nNow looking at what happens next: after 1M completes, the loop moves to 3M and 15M. For 3M, the rollup should succeed if it's working, but 15M and 60M aren't in the OK set yet. When the loop reaches 15M, it tries a REST call since `_gap_tf_already_ok` returns False — but I need to verify if Kiwoom even supports 15-minute candles.\n\nThe key observation is that both the 1M log and the failure log timestamp at 11:02:51, meaning the entire gap fill for 000660 completes and fails within the same second. This suggests the 3M rollup might succeed, but then 15M or 60M fails immediately, triggering the retry timer.\n\nWith `WS_GAP_FILL_ABORT_TF_ON_EMPTY=True`, if the 15M REST call returns empty data (perhaps because it's not configured or the API doesn't support it), the loop breaks and returns False. But this same issue occurred on Aug 10 with zero retries, so I need to check what timeframes were actually configured back then."},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && journalctl -u kis_trader_main.service --since \"2026-08-10 10:50\" --until \"2026-08-10 10:52\" 2>&1 | grep -E \"갭보정|insert|15M|3M|rollup\" | head -20","description":"Aug 10 gap fill details to compare"}}]}}
36: {"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"KEY DIFFERENCE FOUND!\n\nOn Aug 10:\n```\n갭보정 006730 1M → REST insert=23 ...\n갭보정 006730 3M → rollup_1m→3M insert=7 ...\n✅ [갭보정-롤업] 006730 1M→3M 163봉 보강 (확정=163)\n```\n\nOn Aug 10, the 3M rollup log **appeared**! And it was showing `3M → rollup_1m→3M` with counts.\n\nToday:\n```\n갭보정 000660 1M → REST insert=497 ...\n⚠ [갭보정] 000660 일부 TF 실패 → 8s 후 재시도 (1/3)\n```\n\nToday there's no 3M rollup log for 000660 at all, which means the 3M rollup step isn't even being triggered. My fix didn't work—I need to figure out why the lock check isn't allowing the rollup to proceed.\n\nAfter the 1M REST succeeds, `_mark_gap_tf_ok(code, 1)` should be called, making `_1m_in_ok_set` true. But wait—`_fill_gap_for_code` runs on the worker thread, and the 1M REST happens inside that function. After 1M succeeds, the candle aggregation is filled... if 3 is in the `_gap_tf_ok` set, the function chec
The above content was truncated because individual lines are very long. Only a portion of the content is shown.


파일이 매우 방대합니다. 현재 실제 코드 상태를 직접 검증하는 것이 더 효율적입니다. 대화에서 언급된 핵심 수정 사항들을 실제 코드와 대조해 검증하겠습니다.

cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git log --oneline -10 2>&1

cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && cat ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl | python3 -c "
import sys, json
lines = sys.stdin.readlines()
print(f'총 라인 수: {len(lines)}')
# 마지막 몇 개 라인에서 user/assistant 메시지 추출
for line in lines[-10:]:
    try:
        obj = json.loads(line)
        role = obj.get('role', '')
        msg = obj.get('message', {})
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        if isinstance(content, list):
            for c in content:
                if c.get('type') == 'text':
                    print(f'[{role}]: {c[\"text\"][:300]}')
                    print('---')
    except:
        pass
" 2>&1 | head -100

대화 마지막 내용 추출


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:36+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:38:42+09:00

				The command exited with code 0.
				Output:
				2c7ad86 (HEAD -> main, gitea/main) 거래 빠르게 안티에서 병신만든거 커서로 feat: Implement backtest source management and enhance candle data handling
c6bd62a refactor: enhance Optuna backtesting framework, optimize orderbook filtering, and update database management utilities.
cb7e503 feat: Enhance trading system with new e_min_chg_pct parameter and related logic
7050f78 ls kiwoom 구독 히스토리 모두 적재
67eab24 ls증권 히스토리 구독 넣음
61bec4b feat: Add DART strategy and related configurations ㅇ Changes: - Introduced the DART strategy to the trading system, including its configuration and integration into the existing framework. - Updated the database schema to include DART-specific tables for disclosures and watchlists. - Enhanced the backtesting and parameter search functionalities to support the DART strategy. - Implemented new rules for browser verification and API interactions to ensure compliance with the updated DART strategy.
74db491 style: Replace stars with circles in output
853d040 docs: Add troubleshooting guide for 'journalctl: not found' error
dae66d5 feat: Reverse star printing order
c307f2d feat: Add star.py to print increasing star patterns
Terminal ID: 1673452


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:41+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:38:46+09:00

				The command exited with code 0.
				Output:
				총 라인 수: 1563
[assistant]: ### 한 줄 결론

**DB 커넥션 문제가 아닙니다.**
MOMENTUM이 **엔알비(475230) 손절 매도**를 하다가, 모의서버가 **조금씩만 체결**하
고 · **잔고 API가 늦거나 거짓말을 해서**, 매도 자물쇠를 **1~2분씩 붙잡고** 있었던 겁니다.
---

### 초딩 비유

교실에 **문 자물쇠 1개**가 있어요. (`_sell_lock`)

1. MOMENTUM 선생님이 “엔알비 팔자!” 하고 **문을 잠근 채** 증권사에 전화합니다.
2. 증권사(모의)가 “64주 중에 **20주만** 팔렸어요” 합니
---
[user]: <timestamp>Thursday, Aug 13, 2026, 3:49 PM (UTC+9)</timestamp>
<user_query>
초재는 로그 꺼줘 일단 위에껀 좀 생각을 해봐야겠다 비동기든 락밖으로 빼든 코드분석
을 좀 더 해봐야겟따 위치나 알려줘                                                </user_query>
---
[assistant]: 루프 프로파일 로그를 끄고, 매도 락·재매도 관련 코드 위치를 정리합니
다.                                                                              ---
[assistant]: ### 계측 로그
`LOOP_PROFILE_ENABLED=false` 반영됨. 최근 journal에 `LOOP_PROF` 0건. 재시작 없이
꺼진 상태입니다. (`logs/loop_profile.log` 파일은 남아 있고, 새 줄만 안 씀)
---

### 나중에 볼 코드 위치 (매도 락 / 부분체결)

| 뭘 보나 | 파일 | 대략 |
|--------|------|------|
| **문 자물쇠** `_sell_lock` 정의 | `kis_trader/strategies/base.py` | ~164 |
| **루프 매도** (
---
[user]: <timestamp>Thursday, Aug 13, 2026, 3:54 PM (UTC+9)</timestamp>
<user_query>
이 대화내용 파일 어딨어? 로컬에 잇나
</user_query>
---
[assistant]: 네, **이 서버(로컬)에** 있습니다. 워크스페이스 `kis_bot` 안이 아니라
 Cursor 프로젝트 캐시 쪽입니다.
이 대화 본문:

`/home/hoon/.cursor/projects/home-hoon-kis-bot/agent-transcripts/4ee957e7-9710-4e
e8-b688-4fd63cc90853/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl`
- 형식: JSONL (줄마다 이벤트)
- 크기: 약 2.1MB
- 형제 대화들: 같은 `agent-transcripts/` 아래
---
Terminal ID: 1673452


대화의 마지막 내용을 파악했습니다. 이제 핵심 수정사항들을 실제 코드와 대조해 검증하겠습니다.

cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c "
import json

# 전체 대화에서 assistant의 결론/요약 텍스트만 추출
with open('ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl', 'r') as f:
    lines = f.readlines()

print(f'총 대화 라인: {len(lines)}')
topics = []
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
    try:
        obj = json.loads(line)
        role = obj.get('role', '')
        msg = obj.get('message', {})
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        if isinstance(content, list):
            for c in content:
                if c.get('type') == 'text' and role == 'user':
                    text = c['text']
                    # user query만 추출
                    if '<user_query>' in text:
                        start = text.find('<user_query>') + 12
                        end = text.find('</user_query>')
                        query = text[start:end].strip()
                        if query:
                            print(f'[USER #{i}]: {query[:200]}')
                            print()
    except:
        pass
" 2>&1 | head -120

사용자 질문 목록 추출

cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && git log --oneline 2>&1 | head -5 && echo "---" && git diff HEAD~1 HEAD --stat 2>&1 | head -30

최신 커밋 변경사항 확인


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:56+09:00
Tool is running as a background task with task id: c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/task-12
Task Description: cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c "
import json

# 전체 대화에서 assistant의 결론/요약 텍스트만 추출
with open('ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl', 'r') as f:
    lines = f.readlines()

print(f'총 대화 라인: {len(lines)}')
topics = []
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
    try:
        obj = json.loads(line)
        role = obj.get('role', '')
        msg = obj.get('message', {})
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        if isinstance(content, list):
            for c in content:
                if c.get('type') == 'text' and role == 'user':
                    text = c['text']
                    # user query만 추출
                    if '<user_query>' in text:
                        start = text.find('<user_query>') + 12
                        end = text.find('</user_query>')
                        query = text[start:end].strip()
                        if query:
                            print(f'[USER #{i}]: {query[:200]}')
                            print()
    except:
        pass
" 2>&1 | head -120
Task logs are available at: file:///home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/.system_generated/tasks/task-12.log


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:38:57+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:39:08+09:00

				The command exited with code 0.
				Output:
				2c7ad86 거래 빠르게 안티에서 병신만든거 커서로 feat: Implement backtest source management and enhance candle data handling
c6bd62a refactor: enhance Optuna backtesting framework, optimize orderbook filtering, and update database management utilities.
cb7e503 feat: Enhance trading system with new e_min_chg_pct parameter and related logic
7050f78 ls kiwoom 구독 히스토리 모두 적재
67eab24 ls증권 히스토리 구독 넣음
---
 .agents/anti_chat/2.jsonl                          |  632 ++
 .agents/anti_chat/transcript_full.jsonl            | 9617 ++++++++++++++++++++
 __pycache__/database.cpython-312.pyc               |  Bin 216904 -> 217833 bytes
 ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl | 1563 ++++
 backtest_web.py                                    |  123 +-
 database.py                                        |   44 +
 kis_trader/backtest/breakout_backtest_common.py    |   41 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/bt_candle_source.py            |  240 +
 kis_trader/backtest/momentum_backtest_common.py    |   56 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/optuna_orderbook_recommend.py  |  157 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/optuna_web_jobs.py             |    7 +
 kis_trader/backtest/param_search_momentum.py       |   53 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/param_search_optuna.py         |    9 +-
 ...ptuna_breakout_fast_20260813_001301.briefing.md |   21 +
 ...optuna_breakout_tpe_20260813_005625.briefing.md |   21 +
 ...optuna_breakout_tpe_20260813_010648.briefing.md |   23 +
 ...ptuna_momentum_fast_20260812_235406.briefing.md |   22 +
 .../optuna_scalp_fast_20260812_233958.briefing.md  |   22 +
 kis_trader/backtest/scalping_backtest_common.py    |   38 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/tail_backtest_common.py        |   65 +-
 kis_trader/backtest/trade_orderbook_enrich.py      |   10 +-
 kis_trader/engine/momentum_engine.py               |   35 +-
 kis_trader/engine/orderbook_filter.py              |   11 +-
 kis_trader/engine/tail_engine.py                   |   35 +-
 kis_trader/execution/order_manager.py              |   26 +-
 kis_trader/main.py                                 |   23 +-
 kis_trader/network/ws_manager.py                   |  642 +-
 kis_trader/strategies/base.py                      |  659 +-
 kis_trader/strategies/breakout.py                  |   14 +
 kis_trader/strategies/momentum.py                  |   14 +-
Terminal ID: 1673452


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:39:12+09:00
Completed At: 2026-08-13T22:39:12+09:00
Task: c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/task-12
Status: RUNNING
Log: /home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/.system_generated/tasks/task-12.log
Last progress: never


cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c "
import json

with open('ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl', 'r') as f:
    lines = f.readlines()

print(f'총 라인: {len(lines)}')
# user query 추출
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
    try:
        obj = json.loads(line)
        if obj.get('role') == 'user':
            msg = obj.get('message', {})
            content = msg.get('content', [])
            if isinstance(content, list):
                for c in content:
                    if c.get('type') == 'text':
                        text = c['text']
                        if '<user_query>' in text:
                            s = text.find('<user_query>') + 12
                            e = text.find('</user_query>')
                            q = text[s:e].strip()[:200]
                            if q:
                                print(f'[#{i}] {q}')
    except Exception as ex:
        pass
" 2>&1

사용자 질문 전체 추출


Created At: 2026-08-13T22:39:19+09:00
Tool is running as a background task with task id: c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/task-17
Task Description: cd /home/hoon/kis_bot && python3 -c "
import json

with open('ai_chat/4ee957e7-9710-4ee8-b688-4fd63cc90853.jsonl', 'r') as f:
    lines = f.readlines()

print(f'총 라인: {len(lines)}')
# user query 추출
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
    try:
        obj = json.loads(line)
        if obj.get('role') == 'user':
            msg = obj.get('message', {})
            content = msg.get('content', [])
            if isinstance(content, list):
                for c in content:
                    if c.get('type') == 'text':
                        text = c['text']
                        if '<user_query>' in text:
                            s = text.find('<user_query>') + 12
                            e = text.find('</user_query>')
                            q = text[s:e].strip()[:200]
                            if q:
                                print(f'[#{i}] {q}')
    except Exception as ex:
        pass
" 2>&1
Task logs are available at: file:///home/hoon/.gemini/antigravity-ide/brain/c003839d-cffe-4303-8c4a-f484dee4a0af/.system_generated/tasks/task-17.log